{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","uuid":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","normalized_title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","isbns":["9787576004694"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":401,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%80%92%E5%BD%92%E4%B8%8E%E5%81%B6%E7%84%B6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/search"},"page":{"printed_page":188,"pdf_page":200,"physical_index":200,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"a85428318387721e6e73645e51f47ea32d446841e9a37b97eeeaf1a07b8ce8ea"},"chapter":"第三章被组织的无机","content":"在《斐莱布篇》中，苏格拉底与斐莱布就智慧和愉悦哪个更可取展开了一场辩论。苏格拉底的解决方案是，最可取的不是这两个当中的任何一个，而是第三个，即两者的统一。《斐莱布篇》中有一个著名段落——苏格拉底指出有限(τò περα)和无限(τò ǎπειρον)的对立是不够的，我们还要根据它们的共同处(τò κotvóv)进行综合。② 这第三个概念并非黑格尔辩证法意义上的综合，而是谢林所说的“多之中的统一”(unity in multiplicity)。由三个要素组成的这种形式，带来了接连不断的个体化，这也是谢林在他的《论一般哲学形式的可能性》(On the Possibility of a Form of Philosophy in Gen-eral,1794年)中探索的，③在那里他用费希特的名字取代了柏拉图。后来在《论世界灵魂》中，他引入有机形式的说法以讨论一般意义上的自然。当谢林肯定柏拉图的智慧，他一定程度上强调了《斐莱布篇》第16c段，我将在这里附上谢林的翻译，它值得我们关注：\n\n188\n\n递归与偶然\n\n① 马修斯在另一个地方试图把谢林和人类世联系起来；布鲁斯·马修斯，《人类世中的谢林：新自然神话》(Schelling in the Anthropocene:A New Mythology of Nature),见《研讨会：加拿大欧陆哲学杂志》(Symn-posium: Canadian Journal of Continental Philosophy),19,第 1 期,2015年，第94—105页。\n\n② 马修斯，《谢林哲学的有机形式》，第150页。\n\n③谢林，《人类知识中的无条件者：四篇早期论文》(TheUncondi-tional in Human Knowledge : Four Early Essays , 1794—1796 年),弗里茨·马蒂(Fritz Marti)译，路易斯堡，宾夕法尼亚州：巴克内尔大学出版社，1980年,第38—55页。","previous_page":187,"next_page":189}