{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","uuid":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","normalized_title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","isbns":["9787576004694"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":401,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%80%92%E5%BD%92%E4%B8%8E%E5%81%B6%E7%84%B6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/search"},"page":{"printed_page":259,"pdf_page":271,"physical_index":271,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e4d8c8cad111c3a15059614987c46b50ea8692491a3ea215ff99739aae5c99d8"},"chapter":"第四章组织性的无机","content":"我们甚至可以更进一步。斯蒂格勒不仅试图打破亚里士多德的起源和结果的本质关联，他甚至表明，对起源问题的断言是不合法的。事实上，人们只能讨论缺乏起源的必然性，一种必需的欠缺。或者换句话说，技术是偶然的，同时它也是[207]起源。如果起源是偶然的，那么它就不能再被当作本质来把握。在这种情况下，偶然的成了必要的，因为偶然规定了人。人们应当分析技术性的历史，而不是声称存在一种人的原初本质。\n\n让我们再回到偶然性的问题上来，谈谈斯蒂格勒“偶然的哲学化”这一主题的含义。在本章一开始，我们指出西蒙东的偶然性概念接近自然哲学，而斯蒂格勒的偶然性概念更接近艺术实践。对斯蒂格勒来说，艺术家的任务在于调节个体化过程，以构建一贯性的规划也就是说使意外成为必然，去预料意外之物，正如这一章开篇引用的赫拉克利特的说法。为了处理如今感知性(sensibility)的问题或者斯蒂格勒所说的“感性的灾难”(the catastrophe of the sensible)——我们必须把握时代的偶然性，它作为事件(Ereignis)的灾难性生成，并使这种乍看之下无望发生的意外性成为必然；也就是说，不仅把它看作事实或要遵循的命运，而是看作心理和集体个体化的必要条件。\n\n第四章 组织性的无机\n\n259\n\n① 斯蒂格勒，《意外的哲学化》(Philosophising by Accident)，第34页。","previous_page":258,"next_page":260}