{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","uuid":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","normalized_title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","isbns":["9787576004694"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":401,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%80%92%E5%BD%92%E4%B8%8E%E5%81%B6%E7%84%B6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/search"},"page":{"printed_page":293,"pdf_page":305,"physical_index":305,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"ae3674adeac208af1bb12609e405e699d7794f9569ff5cc290f723286daab142"},"chapter":"第五章剩余的非人","content":"§39 后现代性与递归性\n\n我们需要回到第一章开篇处讨论过的，康德的第三个有关自然法则和自由的张力的二律背反。弗里德里希·席勒在《审美教育书简》一书中回应了康德的二律背反。①在书中，席勒不仅讨论了感性和理性的冲突，还从法国革命的角度讨论了政治能力的冲突，②即理性的恐怖对个体的自由。在我们的时代，这些对立采取了另一种形式——也就是通过算法和大数据进行的治理，它与个体自由和欲望对立。席勒和康德当然没有料想到我们这个时代机器的统治。黑格尔在国家的实现方面可能有这种预感；但他大概没有想到精神以理性名义的外化，如今会在算法式的治理术中实现。当然，人们可以争论这种机器中的推理形式是否称得上理性，但事实上，[236]如今的递归算法具有灵活性和自组织、自我改进的能力，这或许会让17世纪和18世纪那些依然天真地把技术和机器等同起来的思想家不知所措。\n\n第五章 剩余的非人\n\n293\n\n① 在这里，我们必须提到彼得·泰尔(PeterThiel)在评论美国政治形势时说的话，他已经意识到民主和自由是不相容的，因为民主界定了自由(比如技术和全领土发展的自由)。技术加速能够超越这种不相容性，以实现自由。见彼得·泰尔，《自由主义者的教育》(EducationofaLibertarian),2009 年，https://www. cato-unbound. org/2009/04/13/peter-thiel/education-libertarian.","previous_page":292,"next_page":294}