{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","uuid":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","normalized_title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","isbns":["9787576004694"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":401,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%80%92%E5%BD%92%E4%B8%8E%E5%81%B6%E7%84%B6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/search"},"page":{"printed_page":301,"pdf_page":313,"physical_index":313,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"a9ab95be6537a92601fc529e2ebad31ad055757beb3b3e3fa7e6bc56a2be8001"},"chapter":"第五章剩余的非人","content":"现在我们要回到系统的问题上。利奥塔看到，来自控制论的系统论是一种强有力的治理和社会调控思维，但他拒绝将其视为哲学体系：“系统论不是哲学体系，而是对现实的描述，一个已经能用普通物理学(包括从天体物理学到粒子物理学领域)…当然还有经济学术语彻底描绘的所谓的现实die sogenannte Wirklichkeit]。”①然而，控制论究竟为何不是[242]一个哲学体系，依然值得怀疑，正如我试图在这本书里表明的，之后我们会看到利奥塔本人也像海德格尔那样，承认了控制论和形而上学的密切关系。我想谈谈利奥塔的这段评论，并把它扩展进我们关于人机条件的讨论中，这种人机条件既涉及知识的合法化，也涉及技术系统的出现。利奥塔清楚地看到了一种从法理(dejure)向事实(de facto)的转变，即律法的规范性被程序的可执行性取代了。事实取代律法定义了规范：\n\n第五章 剩余的非人\n\n301\n\n①让-弗朗索瓦·利奥塔，《崇高之后，美学的状况》(AftertheSublime，the State of Aesthetics，)，见《非人：对时间的思考》，杰弗里·本宁顿和雷奇·鲍比译，加利福尼亚州斯坦福：斯坦福大学出版社，1991年，第135页。\n\n②康德，《判断力批判》，δ23，B78/A77；引自让·弗朗索瓦·利奥塔，《对崇高的兴趣》(Interest of the Sublime)，见《论崇高：在场的问题》(Of the Sublime：Presence in Question)，杰弗里·利布雷特(Jeffrey S. Librett)译，奥尔巴尼：纽约州立大学出版社，1993年，第125页。\n\n③ 利奥塔，《论崇高的分析：康德的判断力批判》，第70页。","previous_page":300,"next_page":302}