{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","uuid":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","normalized_title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","isbns":["9787576004694"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":401,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%80%92%E5%BD%92%E4%B8%8E%E5%81%B6%E7%84%B6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/search"},"page":{"printed_page":314,"pdf_page":326,"physical_index":326,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6b6b80c37de40dee91a7cec529236c30a247623f559a383d52de0005d9d6b7f7"},"chapter":"第五章剩余的非人","content":"这种发展的形而上学的惊人处在于，它不需要终极性。发展不像理性的解放和人类的自由那样依附于某个理念。它只按照其内部的动态，通过加速和自我扩展而被再生产出来。它吸收了偶然性[hasards]、记住它们的信息价值、将其作为对它的运作来说必要的新中介来使用。除了一种宇宙学的巧合[hasards]以外，它没有别的必然性。①\n\n我们该如何理解这段话中出现的两个hasard？我们把第一个译作偶然性，因为成为系统恰恰意味着把偶然性融入其操作的能力。也就是说，偶然性不是打乱了系统因果性的破坏，而是使系统增强其内部动态的东西。我们把第二次出现的hasard译作巧合或意外，因为在这种系统中，必然性与偶然性不再有任何区别，正如我们试图用谢林的自然概念说明的那样。递归从自然机制扩展至机器机制、资本机制以及如今全球化文化机制。发展，正如利奥塔所说，“因此没有终点，但它确实有一个限度，即太阳的预期寿命”。②一种有限度的无止境、肯定性的否定是什么意思？这让我们想到了这本文集中的一篇著名论文，《思维没有身体还能继续吗?》(CanThought Go On without a Body?)。这篇文章是一位女性和一名男哲学家的对话。它始于一个事件，也就是45亿年后的太阳爆炸，这将结束一切有机生命，在此之后一切都无法设想—利奥塔结合[252]太阳灾难和雷·布拉西埃（Ray\n\n314\n\n递归与偶然\n\n①同上，第7页；翻译有所修改。\n\n② 同上。","previous_page":313,"next_page":315}