{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","uuid":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","normalized_title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","isbns":["9787576004694"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":401,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%80%92%E5%BD%92%E4%B8%8E%E5%81%B6%E7%84%B6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/search"},"page":{"printed_page":332,"pdf_page":344,"physical_index":344,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"d5e17dfd572768aa11db384bef8f4d2d9a4a84db7d7df335532c5f353ba53d2a"},"chapter":"第五章剩余的非人","content":"如果我们按照利奥塔的说法，认为肯定性的非人包含抵抗的可能性，那我们还需要进一步发展这个观点。这种非人是未知，它挑战非人的系统，并作为偶然性的必然性发挥作用。但在这里，我们必须回答科学家们的一个问题：我们岂不是在为了未知—或者更准确地说，为了一种神秘的宗教思维—而牺牲科学技术吗？这是现代化的核心困境，因为面对现代科学，古老的宇宙论必须让路。康德给宗教留出空间的尝试被指责为懒惰、不够理性，但这里的问题不仅在于宗教，也涉及只能存在于同宇宙论的关联中的道德价值：这是一种价值宇宙论(axio-cosmology)。正如康德已经预计到的，现代科学是普遍的，因为它能适用于物理现象，但科学与技术受限于一个更广的、无法被还原为天文学的宇宙现实。带着这种价值宇宙论观念，我们想回到感知性和美学的问题上来。在《科学与现代世界》的最后一章“社会进步的要求”(Requi-sites of Social Progress)中，怀德海像席勒那样提出了艺术和审美教育的问题。在评论19世纪工业化的遗留问题时，他把问题归于美学计划的未能实现：\n\n332\n\n递归与偶然\n\n①对勒鲁瓦-古汉分析的批判，见许煜，《论中国的技术问题》，δ 2,“宇宙，宇宙论与宇宙技术”(Cosmos，Cosmology and Cosmotech-nics)。\n\n② 安德烈·勒鲁瓦-古汉，《姿势与话语》，安娜·博斯托克·伯杰译，马萨诸塞州剑桥：麻省理工学院出版社，1993年，311页。","previous_page":331,"next_page":333}