{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","uuid":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","normalized_title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","isbns":["9787576004694"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":401,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%80%92%E5%BD%92%E4%B8%8E%E5%81%B6%E7%84%B6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/search"},"page":{"printed_page":346,"pdf_page":358,"physical_index":358,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"a4d2833d9c77b25f27389cc7c979c1a7af60b2aaff4023d75f256226afd9dd27"},"chapter":"第五章剩余的非人","content":"[278]通过在谢林和有机主义理论中重构一种自然哲学，我们开始了关于递归与偶然的旅程，随后又经历了这种自然哲学在逻辑和控制论中的实现。我们试图提出一种考察哲学和技术、有机体和机器的关系的新方式，也希望用一种宇宙技术思维—它只能在一种其他的宇宙论也能发挥作用的知识系统中被设想补充这种考察，这种思维能同时反思认识论和知识型的问题。问题不在于简单地把控制论妖魔化和低估为单纯的治理术，正如它在今天经常被设想的，而是要通过瓦解其全体化和决定论的思维，构想一种新的控制论视角。不过，这不完全是西蒙东所说的开放机器，因为对西蒙东来说，开放机器只是一个在其递归结构和因果性中，刻写着不确定性余裕的控制论机器。我们的意思是，恰恰要通过把技术重置于它们的起源处，来超越开放机器的构想，也就是说要把技术重置于多样的宇宙现实中。梅亚苏试图用偶然性概念敞开的真正的多元主义，需要靠技术多样性维系，且这种技术多样性总会与其机制的总体化力量对立—无论这个机制是机械论的还是有机论的。如果海德格尔意义上的控制论是哲学的终结，如果递归性已成为过程哲学的“同义词”，那么我们只有借助不同的技术思想重新挪用这个控制论环节，才能设想一种后欧洲哲学。①这便是我们在本书中试图勾勒的轨迹。由于个人能力的限制，我们提出的这些问题依然有待进一步的回答，这种努力仍将是哲学的共同任务。\n\n346\n\n递归与偶然","previous_page":345,"next_page":347}