{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","id":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","uuid":"ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title":"递归与偶然","normalized_title":"递归与偶然","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787576004694","isbns":["9787576004694"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":401,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E9%80%92%E5%BD%92%E4%B8%8E%E5%81%B6%E7%84%B6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ea3b7167-0435-4a94-84b9-80a5359326a4/search"},"page":{"printed_page":99,"pdf_page":111,"physical_index":111,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"935ea751d1292a270782d7a8743da1f5b2e5db46a37829a98789ea1dc5be73d8"},"chapter":"第一章自然与递归","content":"Introduction to the Philosophy of Mythology)的译者注意到，谢林谈到歌德①的“隆起的地质学假说”时，隐含地提到过赫顿的理论，这个假说“从这样一种观点出发，即人们无法再谈论确定和合乎法则的事情，只能谈论偶然和不连续的事件”。②谢林用这个地质假说阐释他的自然偶然性理论，不过，必须把这种偶然性与和赫顿理论冲突的另一个学派区别开，即受居维叶启发的灾变说(catastrophism)。③在赫顿的语境下，灾变说指认为陆地是由一系列灾难形成的观点，如大洪水。根据赫顿的理论，地球是一个由热驱动的持续循环过程，这被称为均变说(uniformitarianism)，这个过程不需要灾难性事件。赫顿的理论引发了一种认为地球既有机又机械的模糊解读。[80]一方面有观点认为地球是个“超有机体”，另一方面也有与之并行的机械论态度。在这一分歧上，赫顿并非无辜，因为他也把地球称为“活的机器”。④没有规律性，地球就不会运转；事实上，赫顿的观察也证实了“自然中存在智慧、系统和一贯性”。⑤然而，赫顿与蒸汽机的发明者詹姆斯·瓦特之间的通信，揭示了地球与机器更深层的关联：\n\n第一章 自然与递归\n\n99\n\n①谢林，《神话哲学的历史批判导论》，梅森·里奇(Mason Richey)和马库斯·齐塞尔斯伯格(Markus Zisselsberger)译，奥尔巴尼：纽约州立大学出版社，2008年，第19页。\n\n② 同上。\n\n③居维叶没有用灾变（catastrophe)这个词，而是用了革命(révolution)一词，英文中被译作灾变。\n\n④ 玛西娅·比约内鲁德(Marcia Bjornerud)，《阅读岩石：地球自传》(Reading the Rocks: The Autobiography of the Earth),纽约: BasicBooks,2006年，第181页。\n\n⑤ 同上。","previous_page":98,"next_page":100}