{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ed4482f9-2315-47ea-9750-97bb05c9236b","title":"感官技术：控制论生物体的调解","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ed4482f9-2315-47ea-9750-97bb05c9236b","id":"ed4482f9-2315-47ea-9750-97bb05c9236b","uuid":"ed4482f9-2315-47ea-9750-97bb05c9236b","title":"感官技术：控制论生物体的调解","normalized_title":"感官技术控制论生物体的调解","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0415970164","isbns":["0415970164","0415970156","9780415970167","9780415970150"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":342,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ed4482f9-2315-47ea-9750-97bb05c9236b","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E6%84%9F%E5%AE%98%E6%8A%80%E6%9C%AF%EF%BC%9A%E6%8E%A7%E5%88%B6%E8%AE%BA%E7%94%9F%E7%89%A9%E4%BD%93%E7%9A%84%E8%B0%83%E8%A7%A3","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ed4482f9-2315-47ea-9750-97bb05c9236b/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ed4482f9-2315-47ea-9750-97bb05c9236b/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ed4482f9-2315-47ea-9750-97bb05c9236b","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ed4482f9-2315-47ea-9750-97bb05c9236b/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ed4482f9-2315-47ea-9750-97bb05c9236b/search"},"page":{"printed_page":254,"pdf_page":266,"physical_index":266,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"d2f3607fb5f0ee39ad8670c3123b70e57f6bcbfc4e8d38b435080b421b456938"},"chapter":"hodiPs ICOOP-","content":"顺便说一句，这是列夫Manovich对数字化现象的一般解释。参见Manovich,2000，第1章。\n\nvii.。伯纳德·斯蒂格勒是感性-先验的技术要素的思想家，也是技术之后经验与先验的内陷的思想家。参见斯蒂格勒，1998。\n\nviii.;斯蒂格勒对勒罗伊-古尔汉的经验主义的批判性解读涉及到这种起源概念所产生的困难。参见斯蒂格勒1998，第1部分，第3章。\n\n九。拉康对凝视的分析，对作为凝视的对象a的分析，将广播和电视认定为凝视的制度性支持，这并非偶然。\n\n鲁耶尔的主体性形成了对莱布尼茨“小概念”的补充。我在《新媒体的新哲学》第五章中详细讨论了鲁耶尔。\n\nxi.;米歇尔·皮克林在评论“反向副现象主义”的概念时，澄清了鲁耶尔的观点:\n\n鲁耶告诉我们，身体和精神的二元性是虚幻的，因为我们与身体的关系不是拥有的秩序，而是存在的秩序:我们没有身体，我们是一个有机体。身体是别人看到的器官主义;………有机体，从内部感受到的身体”(Piclin 1992, 161)。\n\nxii.;这种优先性可以从观察(描述)自创生生物的复杂性(现象学-地方统一性)中清楚地看到:\n\n既然它是自创生系统的一个决定性特征，它应该指定自己的边界，一个适当的认识\n\nNotes\n\n254","previous_page":253,"next_page":255}