{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ed47a6aa-1158-48fa-a62c-b2becccc794b","title":"照亮世界的马克思：张一兵与齐泽克、哈维、奈格里等学者的对话","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ed47a6aa-1158-48fa-a62c-b2becccc794b","id":"ed47a6aa-1158-48fa-a62c-b2becccc794b","uuid":"ed47a6aa-1158-48fa-a62c-b2becccc794b","title":"照亮世界的马克思：张一兵与齐泽克、哈维、奈格里等学者的对话","normalized_title":"照亮世界的马克思张一兵与齐泽克哈维奈格里等学者的对话","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":185,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ed47a6aa-1158-48fa-a62c-b2becccc794b","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E7%85%A7%E4%BA%AE%E4%B8%96%E7%95%8C%E7%9A%84%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%EF%BC%9A%E5%BC%A0%E4%B8%80%E5%85%B5%E4%B8%8E%E9%BD%90%E6%B3%BD%E5%85%8B%E3%80%81%E5%93%88%E7%BB%B4%E3%80%81%E5%A5%88%E6%A0%BC%E9%87%8C%E7%AD%89%E5%AD%A6%E8%80%85%E7%9A%84%E5%AF%B9%E8%AF%9D","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ed47a6aa-1158-48fa-a62c-b2becccc794b/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ed47a6aa-1158-48fa-a62c-b2becccc794b/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ed47a6aa-1158-48fa-a62c-b2becccc794b","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ed47a6aa-1158-48fa-a62c-b2becccc794b/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ed47a6aa-1158-48fa-a62c-b2becccc794b/search"},"page":{"printed_page":120,"pdf_page":128,"physical_index":128,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"a3892b36a19c21b397d02440cfe15a372b46d24bc83aef0b361975294213783c"},"chapter":"照亮世界的马克思","content":"马克思主义思想传统中的这一“生产力一技术无罪论”，直到西方马克思主义的开创者，青年卢卡奇那里，才第一次被打破。青年卢卡奇经过韦伯合理化概念的中介，无意中碰到了生产力一技术的批判问题，他将马克思对资本主义生产方式的批判，从生产关系延伸到了生产和生产力本身。他在解释马克思的物化批判理论时，将马克思那里的关系物化，经过韦伯语境中的泰勒制和流水线，延伸到技术本身在劳动过程中对工人主体性产生的奴役，由此开启了技术和生产有罪论的前提。\n\n这一生产有罪论的线索，到了法兰克福学派那里，在霍克海默和阿多诺的《启蒙辩证法》之后，开启了对工具理性的深刻批判。在马克思那里与奴役并不直接相关的知识本身，成为批判的对象。这样，法兰克福的工具理性批判，接续着青年卢卡奇，把这一对技术生产力的反思更加向前推进了一步。阿多诺在《否定的辩证法》中，把马克思所推崇的科学技术和生产力，讽刺为“想把这个星球变成一个大作坊”。因此在从马克思到西方马克思对待技术的态度中，我们看到一种从中性到激\n\n照亮世界的马克思\n\n120","previous_page":119,"next_page":121}