{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ef817ee5-07cd-4d04-b5aa-20e07a77acc2","title":"审美资本主义：品味的工业化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567508804","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"ef817ee5-07cd-4d04-b5aa-20e07a77acc2","id":"ef817ee5-07cd-4d04-b5aa-20e07a77acc2","uuid":"ef817ee5-07cd-4d04-b5aa-20e07a77acc2","title":"审美资本主义：品味的工业化","normalized_title":"审美资本主义品味的工业化","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787567508804","isbns":["9787567508804"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":221,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ef817ee5-07cd-4d04-b5aa-20e07a77acc2","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E5%AE%A1%E7%BE%8E%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%EF%BC%9A%E5%93%81%E5%91%B3%E7%9A%84%E5%B7%A5%E4%B8%9A%E5%8C%96","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/ef817ee5-07cd-4d04-b5aa-20e07a77acc2/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/ef817ee5-07cd-4d04-b5aa-20e07a77acc2/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/ef817ee5-07cd-4d04-b5aa-20e07a77acc2","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ef817ee5-07cd-4d04-b5aa-20e07a77acc2/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/ef817ee5-07cd-4d04-b5aa-20e07a77acc2/search"},"page":{"printed_page":75,"pdf_page":82,"physical_index":82,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"7bb85df5c9885371db5e6165017fe2881744394ba6020085d40e535a8b51f228"},"chapter":"审美资本主义","content":"在品味工业化的同时，人类理应从他的个人需求中解脱出来。当艺术魅力能够被灌注到一件工业产品中并变化出多种人造产品，公众就成为审美消费者。只有成功地实现艺术的工业演绎，才能够成就审美资本主义的飞跃。然而，工业在剥夺了艺术管制感性特权的同时，本身是否也铸造了另一种审美欲望喜好?\n\n工业向审美的转变\n\n如果所有的工业产品最初都是艺术产品，那工业则以其推广创造的力量为特点。最初是出于什么动机生产者给审美创造赋予了特权？与塔尔德所排斥的政治经济观点不同，产生价值的并不是劳动这种简单的再生产力，而是创造，即个人非物质的能力。①如果少了创造，经济必将陷入重复模仿的僵局。此外，塔尔德在19世纪末提出的、到了21世纪变得如此习见的非物质经济这一公设，明显对立于各种各样的政治经济观点，包括李嘉图(David Ricardo)、斯密以及马克思的政治经济观点。\n\n①塔尔德以预言者的口吻谈到：“在产品这一词条下，举个例子，同时排列了所谓物质的产品和所谓非物质的产品，乱七八糟地混杂了对某样东西的发掘和推广、艺术的创造以及其工业再生产。”(塔尔德，《社会逻辑》，第475页。)如需印证此观点,须参考毛里奇奥·拉扎拉托(MaurizioLAZZARATO)在《创造的力量——塔尔德的反政治经济的社会心理学》(Puissancesdel'invention. La psychologie sociale de Tarde contre l'économie politique)一书中的分析。\n\n75","previous_page":74,"next_page":76}