{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f268fc36-9638-4031-ac8b-0eb144fb5157","title":"跟大卫·哈维读《资本论》 第二卷","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787532768974","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f268fc36-9638-4031-ac8b-0eb144fb5157","id":"f268fc36-9638-4031-ac8b-0eb144fb5157","uuid":"f268fc36-9638-4031-ac8b-0eb144fb5157","title":"跟大卫·哈维读《资本论》 第二卷","normalized_title":"跟大卫哈维读资本论第二卷","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787532768974","isbns":["9787532768974"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":418,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f268fc36-9638-4031-ac8b-0eb144fb5157","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%B7%9F%E5%A4%A7%E5%8D%AB%C2%B7%E5%93%88%E7%BB%B4%E8%AF%BB%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B%20%E7%AC%AC%E4%BA%8C%E5%8D%B7","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f268fc36-9638-4031-ac8b-0eb144fb5157/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/f268fc36-9638-4031-ac8b-0eb144fb5157/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/f268fc36-9638-4031-ac8b-0eb144fb5157","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f268fc36-9638-4031-ac8b-0eb144fb5157/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f268fc36-9638-4031-ac8b-0eb144fb5157/search"},"page":{"printed_page":8,"pdf_page":15,"physical_index":15,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"e8e168901e1ba0b5c3f1ec32f4c29a45ce0c8049d2b414673f7d5fc10cddd341"},"chapter":"跟大卫·哈维读《资本论》","content":"缺乏政治性的内容让第二卷变得更为糟糕。正如欧内斯特·曼德尔在给企鹅版的《资本论》写的导言中指出的那样，恩格斯担心“第二卷定会使人大失所望，因为它在很大程度上是纯学术性的，没有多少鼓动性的材料”。①这从某种程度上来说也是一种保守的说法。第二卷失去了贯穿第一卷并一次次赋予其活力的道义愤怒；阶级斗争不见了，阶级之间的活跃关系也一样；极为强烈的讽刺不复存在，也没有革命的号召。马克思好像只对资本流通的具体细节感兴趣，他把自已辛辣的批评这把利剑收了起来(只有批评李嘉图和亚当·斯密的“错误”时除外)，并在大部分内容中进行了消极的描述。\n\n尽管中断和危机的潜在可能性被反复探究，将其转化为现实力量的催化剂却很大程度上缺失了。这让人有时候觉得一个永存的资本主义体系的积累能永远进行下去，只是偶尔会遇到点小麻烦。罗莎·卢森堡对第二卷结尾的抽象再生产图式表示强烈不满：“积累、生产、实现和交换，都按部就班地准确进行着。”她讽刺道(这基于马克思对一年到另一年积累扩张进行的冗长的数学计算，有时还有错误)；“毫无疑问这种特殊的积累’能无限进行下去，要多久有多久一只要墨水和纸还够你继续写下去。”\n\n跟大卫·哈维读《资本论》\n\n① 《马克思恩格斯文集》，第十卷，第535页，北京：人民出版社，2009。\n\n008","previous_page":7,"next_page":9}