{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title":"资本主义概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","uuid":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title":"资本主义概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","normalized_title":"资本主义概念理念图像论当代马克思资本论的若干面向","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":271,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%E3%80%81%E7%90%86%E5%BF%B5%E3%80%81%E5%9B%BE%E5%83%8F%E8%AE%BA%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B%E7%9A%84%E8%8B%A5%E5%B9%B2%E9%9D%A2%E5%90%91","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"10 / 9","pdf_page":14,"physical_index":14,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6fb2223b5a8ddda8abc067b909efe5cbca9ba3c4c03f70a2b3825af7831c0147"},"chapter":"资本主义：概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","content":"将经济价值，尤其是资本理解为一种社会关系：一方面是商品化的劳动力，另一方面是对其他生产资料的所有权（而不是新古典意义上仅仅作为用于生产商品或服务的耐用物品，包括货币），会改变我们对资本主义社会的政治性理解。作为一种社会关系的资本的发展，这一历史性转变（包括把劳动力作为“可变”资本）就成为了资本主义社会实践中最基本且本质上充满冲突、对抗的结构的历史性变迁。因此，基于马克思资本概念的资本主义观，与任何以“市场”概念为基础的概念有着根本不同；尽管市场（以及更广义的交换关系）当然是资本基本社会关系的表现和显现方式的核心，作为受法律规制的交换形式。如今，这一概念往往包含了那些马克思在《资本论》第一卷末尾将其置于历史形成的“所谓原始（ursprünglich）积累”的持续性形式，即那些“剥夺式征用”（expropriation through dispossession），<sup>17</sup>以及对资本社会关系本身所固有的暴力关系（Gewalt）的重新强调（见下文第九章），并且越来越多地意识到资本本身的“再封建化”倾向（见下文第七章）。\n\n马克思关于资本主义的概念是：在这种社会类型中，资本关系在社会经济上占主导地位。但是，资本社会关系体系的结构总体性与资本主义社会的（总体）历史现实性之间的关系是什么？这或许是马克思资本主义概念的核心问题，自 20 世纪 60 年代欧洲马克思主义理论争论复兴以来，这一问题再次成为争论焦点——被描绘为“理论”与“历史”\n\n导论\n\n10\n\n<sup>17</sup> 参见 Claudia von Werlhof, ‘Why Peasants and Housewives Do Not Disappear in the Capitalist World-System’, Working Paper No. 68, Sociology of Development Research Center, University of Bielefeld, 1985; and ‘Globalization and the Permanent Process of Primitive Accumulation: The Example of the MAI, the Multilateral Agreement on Investment’, Journal of World Systems Research, vol. 6, no. 3 (Fall-Winter 2000), pp. 728-747.\n\n9","previous_page":13,"next_page":15}