{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title":"资本主义概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","uuid":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title":"资本主义概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","normalized_title":"资本主义概念理念图像论当代马克思资本论的若干面向","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":271,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%E3%80%81%E7%90%86%E5%BF%B5%E3%80%81%E5%9B%BE%E5%83%8F%E8%AE%BA%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B%E7%9A%84%E8%8B%A5%E5%B9%B2%E9%9D%A2%E5%90%91","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/search"},"page":{"printed_page":103,"pdf_page":108,"physical_index":108,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"d24797a19826d7991b91bedac9c3bdebac259156d8d6e0a50539b5da80102963"},"chapter":"资本主义：概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","content":"5. 从价值的生产到再生产的价值化\n\n蒂蒂·巴塔查里亚（Tithi Bhattacharya）\n\n《资本论》当然是关于工人阶级，因而也是关于劳动的。<sup>1</sup>这一论断之所以看似有争议，是因为除却少数段落和著名的工作日章节，《资本论》作为文本主要关注的是抽象劳动或劳动的价值形式。正因《资本论》最深刻地揭示了价值形式如何剥夺并消灭人类劳动的所有感性属性，马克思在书中的核心关切似乎在于追溯这种消灭的运作机制，而非确立人类劳动的主观意识层面。\n\n这种将《资本论》解读为纯粹围绕雇佣劳动的形式规定性而展开的文本，促使某些马克思主义者进一步推演资本主义生产方式的“无差别性”（indifference）。例如该观点的重要倡导者艾伦·梅克辛斯·伍德（EllenMeiksins Wood）便主张：\n\n性别平等与种族平等……原则上并不与资本主义相悖。反之，阶级不平等的消亡则与资本主义本质相悖。同时，尽管阶级剥削构成资本主义的本质特征——性别或种族不平等则不然——资本主义仍将所有社会关系置于其需求之下。<sup>2</sup>\n\n在这种对马克思的解读中，资本主义作为一种制度，其生产与维系被重构为首个且唯一无需依赖非经济领域的不平等的的剥削体系。此类不平等的存在被视为偶然而非制度必需——该制度的再生产可通过工资形式实现，或从经济上不平等但法律上平等的主体身上，榨取剩余价值来保障。\n\n105\n\n<sup>1</sup> 我感谢亚伦·贾菲（Aaron Jaffe）对题目所提供的建议。\n\n<sup>2</sup> Ellen Meiksins Wood, Democracy Against Capitalism: Renewing Historical Materialism, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1995, p. 259.\n\n103","previous_page":null,"next_page":null}