{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title":"资本主义概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","uuid":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title":"资本主义概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","normalized_title":"资本主义概念理念图像论当代马克思资本论的若干面向","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":271,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%E3%80%81%E7%90%86%E5%BF%B5%E3%80%81%E5%9B%BE%E5%83%8F%E8%AE%BA%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B%E7%9A%84%E8%8B%A5%E5%B9%B2%E9%9D%A2%E5%90%91","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/search"},"page":{"printed_page":12,"pdf_page":17,"physical_index":17,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"dcec59acad949fc7c295c27122a3bb429e2eaf6c463d8cc8106ae0bb428b6464"},"chapter":"资本主义：概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","content":"而另一个方向，则强调马克思所指出的资本内在倾向的逐步历史实现：即其社会关系的普遍化，以及对所有其他社会形式的替代（和或重新功能化）。<sup>24</sup>这种自我完成的资本主义概念有多种称谓与理论形式：从特隆蒂/奈格里所提出的“总体吸纳”（即社会本身被“实质”吸纳于资本），到朗西埃所言的“绝对”资本主义（作为一种类国家的官僚形式），再到巴利巴尔的“纯粹”或“绝对”资本主义，<sup>25</sup>这些观点如今被重新构想为更马克思式的“总体吸纳”（见下文第二章）。在奈格里的著作中，历史与本体论的这一分裂使其同时指向这两个方向：既假定资本已实现了普遍化，又假定存在本体上具有抗拒性和创造性的非资本残余。从哲学上讲，把资本关系的总体或绝对实现作为总体或绝对的资本主义来看待，标志着从作为解释性概念的马克思资本主义向作为一种理念的资本主义的转变。\n\n资本主义：概念、理念、图像\n\n<sup>21</sup> 英文版见 Louis Althusser, On the Reproduction of Capitalism: Ideology andIdeological State Apparatuses, trans. G.M. Goshgarian, London and New York: Verso,2014. 其1970年名篇《意识形态国家机器》即节选自该书手稿。该理论视角可追溯至葛兰西对霸权与国家概念的拓展性阐释。\n\n<sup>22</sup> 参见 Lisa Vogel, Marxism and the Oppression of Women: Towards a Unitary Theory, New Brunswick NJ: Rutgers University Press, 1983; 更广义的人类学视角见 Gayle Rubin, ‘The “Traffic in Women”: Notes on the Political Economy of Sex’, in Rayna R. Reiter (ed.), Towards an Anthropology of Women, New York: Monthly Review Press, 1975, pp. 157-210; 近期研究则见 Silvia Federici, Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle, New York: PM Press, 2012.\n\n<sup>23</sup> 参见 Nancy Fraser, ‘Marketization, Social Protection Emancipation: Toward a Neo-Polanyian Conception of Capitalist Crisis’, in Craig Calhoun and Georgi Derlugian (eds), Business as Usual: The Roots of the Global Financial Meltdown, New York: NYU Press, 2011, pp. 137-158; Nancy Fraser, ‘A Triple Movement? Parsing the Politics of Crisis after Polanyi’, New Left Review 81 (May-June 2013), pp. 119-132; Nancy Fraser and Rahel Jaeggi, Capitalism: A Conversation in Critical Theory, Cambridge: Polity Press, 2018, chs 1 and 2.\n\n此处还需提及关于“资本主义多样性”的社会学文献，常以地理命名：如所谓“亚洲式”资本主义、“东欧式”资本主义、“南美式”资本主义等。Peter A. Halland David Soskice (eds), Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Com-parative Advantage, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. 然而该研究主要关注文化遗产、法律及政治形式的经济价值差异，具有零散性特征，未能整合进资本主义的整体历史叙事。\n\n12","previous_page":null,"next_page":13}