{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title":"资本主义概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","uuid":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title":"资本主义概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","normalized_title":"资本主义概念理念图像论当代马克思资本论的若干面向","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":271,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%E3%80%81%E7%90%86%E5%BF%B5%E3%80%81%E5%9B%BE%E5%83%8F%E8%AE%BA%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B%E7%9A%84%E8%8B%A5%E5%B9%B2%E9%9D%A2%E5%90%91","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/search"},"page":{"printed_page":13,"pdf_page":18,"physical_index":18,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"cef29a5bfbaeff95e776ce49e452f378e33043afcf5d1ad5392a1ffdf73019ed"},"chapter":"资本主义：概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","content":"理念（黑格尔还是柏拉图？）\n\n将资本主义（而非资本）作为一种理念来理解，在从柏拉图到康德、黑格尔及其后的经典哲学意义上，可以呈现出两种在政治上截然对立的形式。一方面，对于左翼而言，我们得到的是一种反乌托邦式的资本主义概念，其作为资本理念的自我实现——按黑格尔将“理念”理解为“概念与现实的统一”之意：正如黑格尔所写，“全部现实的东西都只有在自身内具有理念，并表达出理念时，才存在着”。<sup>26</sup>在哲学上，这将是一种极端的黑格尔马克思式政治经济学，价值形式主体性的异化对象性已在社会上被绝对化为理念的现实。历史唯物主义沦为绝对唯心主义。在那种情况下，很难想象“历史”还能如何复原。另一方面，则是更为柏拉图式的右翼投射，将此类反乌托邦当作乌托邦：无论是安·兰德（Ayn Rand）所说的“作为未知理念的资本主义”，还是尼克·兰德（NickLand）所提出的那种虚无主义-加速主义版本（nihilist-accelerationist ver-sion）的资本主义原教旨主义，其中资本充当主体的角色，进行一种原尼采式（proto-Nietzschean）自我毁灭的解放。<sup>27</sup>在同一哲学场域上，安·兰德的资本主义柏拉图主义在此处显得是阿兰·巴迪欧“共产主义理念”的直接意识形态对应物与对手。<sup>28</sup>（“今日柏拉图！”曾是巴迪欧在巴黎直到最近所讲授“当代哲学”课程的标题。）\n\n导论\n\n<sup>24</sup> 关于前/非资本主义社会关系与意识形态形式在资本主义下的再功能化问 题，请参见 Étienne Balibar and Immanuel Wallerstein, Race, Nation, Class: Ambiguous Identities, London and New York: Verso, 1991.\n\n<sup>25</sup> Étienne Balibar, ‘Critique in the 21st Century: Political Economy Still, and Religion Again’, Radical Philosophy 200 (November/December 2016), pp. 11-21, 12-13, www.radicalphilosophyarchive.com/article/critique-in-the-21st-century.\n\n<sup>26</sup> Hegel’s Science of Logic, trans. A.V. Miller, Atlantic Highlands NJ: Humanities\n\n13","previous_page":12,"next_page":14}