{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title":"资本主义概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","uuid":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title":"资本主义概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","normalized_title":"资本主义概念理念图像论当代马克思资本论的若干面向","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":271,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%E3%80%81%E7%90%86%E5%BF%B5%E3%80%81%E5%9B%BE%E5%83%8F%E8%AE%BA%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B%E7%9A%84%E8%8B%A5%E5%B9%B2%E9%9D%A2%E5%90%91","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"16 / 15","pdf_page":20,"physical_index":20,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"587836ba617a9bdffa87d7d269e66c8ff6a46479506790709959828e02a0adeb"},"chapter":"资本主义：概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","content":"正是在这种语境下，本次研讨会（这些论文的来源）的任务书才提出了“在激进左翼政治从历史退回为理念的情形下，探询当代‘资本与‘资本主义’概念含义的问题”的呼吁。要追寻与当前资本主义社会的历史现实相连的解放性政治的可能性，就必须追寻马克思关于资本与资本主义概念的理论含义，尤其是其政治含义。\n\n如果共产主义已经以一种贬义的方式，即在深刻的世界历史进程意义上与历史现实脱节，退回到理念领域，那么这种退回仍会产生对该现实的批判性距离；而当现实本身越来越朝向更纯粹或“绝对”资本主义的方向自我转化时，这种距离显得愈发具有吸引力。在此情境下，巴迪欧-齐泽克逃向一个与之竞争的纯粹理念之外的形而上学极端，逻辑上或许说得通；然而在社会或人性层面上却毫无意义。按照康德关于“概念-理念”对立的图式，尽管逃往一个原则上“超出可能经验”的境地可能能安抚某些知识分子的感受，但那并非构建作为必然的社会实践的政治（politics）之可行的出发点。<sup>31</sup>\n\n导论\n\n16\n\n见《马克思恩格斯文集》第一卷，人民出版社，2009，第539页。\n\n<sup>30</sup> Costas Douzinas and Slavoj Žižek (eds), The Idea of Communism, London and New York: Verso, 2010; Slavoj Žižek (ed.), The Idea of Communism 2: The New York Conference, London and New York: Verso, 2013; Alex Taek-Gwang Lee and Slavoj Žižek (eds), The Idea of Communism 3: The Seoul Conference, London and New York: Verso, 2016.\n\n15","previous_page":19,"next_page":21}