{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title":"资本主义概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","uuid":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title":"资本主义概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","normalized_title":"资本主义概念理念图像论当代马克思资本论的若干面向","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":271,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%E3%80%81%E7%90%86%E5%BF%B5%E3%80%81%E5%9B%BE%E5%83%8F%E8%AE%BA%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B%E7%9A%84%E8%8B%A5%E5%B9%B2%E9%9D%A2%E5%90%91","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/search"},"page":{"printed_page":184,"pdf_page":189,"physical_index":189,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"c184be9c10f3db083a9ef2fc58f8a3c6e105ad8b61c22a46d215eb2e677420bd"},"chapter":"资本主义：概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","content":"这绝非颠倒“政治是战争通过其他手段的延续”这一公式的问题，而是资本在与各类斗争的持续对抗中，所采取的战争交织于政治、政治交织于战争的状态。政治不再是克劳塞维茨所说的国家政治，而是金融化经济的政治，它与多重战争相互交织，这些战争既驱动并维系着主动的破坏之战，包括阶级战争、种族战争、性别战争以及主体性战争，它们构成了其他所有战争的全球性“环境”。我们难道不正是生活在“内战主体化”（subjectivation of civil wars）的时代吗？\n\n在下一部分中，我们将说明社会冲突（social warfare）无法被简化为某种能以辩证方式将其平息的阶级斗争，而这正是将政治权力作为战争进行分析的前提。我们将在福柯的理论框架内展开论述，同时也对其提出批判：治理术（governmentality）并未取代战争。治理术对战争与权力的可逆性进行组织、治理和控制。这种可逆性，为福柯提出的权力关系（规训、安全与治理术关系）与战略对抗之间的本质差异赋予了新的意义。<sup>19</sup>\n\n190\n\n资本主义：概念、理念、图像\n\n<sup>17</sup> 即31章中的“温和贸易”。\n\n<sup>18</sup> David Harvey, The New Imperialism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003, p. 164.\n\n<sup>19</sup> Cf. Michel Foucault, ‘The Subject and Power’ (1982), in Essential Works of Foucault (1954 -1984), vol. 3, ed. James D. Faubion, London: Penguin Books, 2002, p. 346.\n\n184","previous_page":null,"next_page":null}