{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title":"资本主义概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","uuid":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title":"资本主义概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","normalized_title":"资本主义概念理念图像论当代马克思资本论的若干面向","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":271,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%E3%80%81%E7%90%86%E5%BF%B5%E3%80%81%E5%9B%BE%E5%83%8F%E8%AE%BA%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B%E7%9A%84%E8%8B%A5%E5%B9%B2%E9%9D%A2%E5%90%91","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/search"},"page":{"printed_page":186,"pdf_page":191,"physical_index":191,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"db98ce417547a363252df96ce77e131da6c14b61dedcabf014c3564d007a20d9"},"chapter":"资本主义：概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","content":"延伸这一对资本辩证法的批判（通过具体抽象层面的资本主义概念对资本的辩证概念化批判），我们可以发现资本不仅是一种剥削性的社会关系，同时也密不可分地是一种战略性的战争关系。资本同时在两个层面运作，并在二者之间切换。与福柯的观点相反，治理术的建立并未消除战争，而是以其他手段延续了战争。任何对冲突及其所蕴含的主体化过程的定义，都必须从资本的战略联结出发——资本既以“关系”也以“非关系”的形式展开，既体现为治理术也体现为战争。\n\n战争，或者说敌对者之间的对抗策略，能够转化为治理者与被治理者之间的权力关系，原因在于相对稳定的机制（装置、规则、法律）使制度能够以足够的确定性和可预测性去引导被治理者的行为。但正如福柯在《主体与权力》（The Subject and Power）中所言，治理者与被治理者之间的每一种权力关系都可能引发新的战略对抗，从而将被治理者转化为敌对者，开启局势潜在的逆转。20 世纪 60 年代末 70 年代初的情况正是如此：二战后美国的政治-军事胜利使其得以建立新的权力关系，而新一代冲突将在这些关系中发展，为新的战略对抗建立背景：1968 年那场非同寻常的革命。因此，我们必须仔细区分两种场景下所蕴含的冲突、自由与主体性，一种是权力关系（治理术）所蕴含的，另一种是战略对抗所蕴含的。这两种场景中的“冲突”、“主体性”与“自由”并非同一概念。\n\n资本主义：概念、理念、图像\n\n<sup>21</sup> Michel Foucault, ‘Nietzsche, Genealogy, History’ (1971), in The Foucault Reader, ed. Paul Rabinow, London: Penguin Books, 1984, p. 85.\n\n<sup>22</sup> 同上。\n\n186","previous_page":null,"next_page":null}