{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title":"资本主义概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","id":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","uuid":"f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title":"资本主义概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","normalized_title":"资本主义概念理念图像论当代马克思资本论的若干面向","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":null,"isbns":[],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":271,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E4%B8%BB%E4%B9%89%E6%A6%82%E5%BF%B5%E3%80%81%E7%90%86%E5%BF%B5%E3%80%81%E5%9B%BE%E5%83%8F%E8%AE%BA%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E3%80%8A%E8%B5%84%E6%9C%AC%E8%AE%BA%E3%80%8B%E7%9A%84%E8%8B%A5%E5%B9%B2%E9%9D%A2%E5%90%91","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f37142a0-40fb-4cc4-a610-9ea25997b974/search"},"page":{"printed_page":"26 / 25","pdf_page":30,"physical_index":30,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"6e93d1fce2c38a8f1f8e1ce246831d8e71a0cc4d034be906b30df561c9aaa693"},"chapter":"资本主义：概念、理念、图像论当代马克思《资本论》的若干面向","content":"吉尔特·罗伊滕（Geert Reuten）在声称货币的价值形式是“价值的构成”时也持相同的观点——这因此带来了一个问题，因为我们想确切知道为何货币代表价值，为什么货币能够购买所有其他商品。令人惊讶的是，罗伊滕似乎没有认为有必要深入马克思的分析。相反，他在循环的“澄清”（和对“抽象劳动”和“实体”概念基于字数上可有可无的“证明”！）中徘徊，这些“澄清”更倾向于混淆问题而非解决问题。<sup>5</sup>当罗伊滕将马克思抽象劳动的价值实体概念仅仅称为一个“隐喻”时，这一点显得尤为明显。<sup>6</sup>然而，在其文本中并没有任何地方指出这种实体是什么的隐喻。同时，罗伊滕声称，“古典”经济学者持有一种“真实化身”（real embodiment）的劳动价值论，而这在马克思著作中有所“残留”：“马克思……被困在从黑格尔（实体）和古典政治经济学（化身）继承而来的物质的实体-化身的隐喻中。”<sup>7</sup>然而，无论劳动作为价值的实体被视为仅仅是一个“隐喻”，还是的确是“具身”于商品中，它都无法兼得两者。更令人奇怪的是，罗伊滕得出结论，认为马克思在其抽象概念方面存在“模糊”或“不清晰”，这一判断更适用于罗伊滕自身的论点。因此，罗伊滕不仅曲解了马克思的理论，实际上也不清楚马克思直接的拜物教批判方法；他进一步解释说“价值在市场交换前不存在。”<sup>8</sup>这实际上与马克思的分析相悖，正如我们很快将看到的。\n\n形式分析与批判：马克思的社会劳动价值理论\n\n<sup>4</sup> Christopher J. Arthur, ‘Money and Exchange’, Capital and Class 90 (Autumn 2006), p. 10; The New Dialectic and Marx’s ‘Capital’, Leiden: Brill, 2004, pp. 86, 12, 158. 对阿瑟《新辩证法与马克思的〈资本论〉》一书的批判，见Elena Louisa Lange, ‘The Critique of Political Economy and the “New Dialectic”: Marx, Hegel, and the Problem of Christopher J. Arthur’s “Homology Thesis”’, Crisis and Critique, vol. 3, no. 3 (2016), pp. 235-272.\n\n<sup>5</sup> Geert Reuten, ‘Money as Constituent of Value’, in F. Moseley (ed.), Marx’s Theory of Money: Modern Appraisals, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005, pp. 78-92.\n\n<sup>6</sup> Geert Reuten, ‘The Difficult Labor of a Theory of Social Value: Metaphors and Systematic Dialectics at the Beginning of Marx’s Capital’, in F. Moseley (ed.), Marx’s Method in Capital: A Reexamination, Atlantic Highlands NJ: Humanities Press, 1993, pp. 89-113; 此处为 pp. 89, 106, 110.\n\n26\n\n<sup>7</sup> 同上，p. 110. 这句话的无意中的滑稽在于它暗示了黑格尔和斯密持有或多或少相同的理论。\n\n25","previous_page":29,"next_page":31}