{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f4b54542-8403-4515-a674-82b3120af71d","title":"[国外马克思学译丛]马克思的社会学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303230143","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f4b54542-8403-4515-a674-82b3120af71d","id":"f4b54542-8403-4515-a674-82b3120af71d","uuid":"f4b54542-8403-4515-a674-82b3120af71d","title":"[国外马克思学译丛]马克思的社会学","normalized_title":"国外马克思学译丛马克思的社会学","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787303230143","isbns":["9787303230143"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":192,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f4b54542-8403-4515-a674-82b3120af71d","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%5B%E5%9B%BD%E5%A4%96%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E5%AD%A6%E8%AF%91%E4%B8%9B%5D%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E7%9A%84%E7%A4%BE%E4%BC%9A%E5%AD%A6","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f4b54542-8403-4515-a674-82b3120af71d/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/f4b54542-8403-4515-a674-82b3120af71d/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/f4b54542-8403-4515-a674-82b3120af71d","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f4b54542-8403-4515-a674-82b3120af71d/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f4b54542-8403-4515-a674-82b3120af71d/search"},"page":{"printed_page":14,"pdf_page":38,"physical_index":38,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"c4bbf5447929dc7ced9f950b2b11a8704508a42efae282d1c65227863e44cebb"},"chapter":"马克思的社会学","content":"放弃了对马克思主义的经济主义和历史主义的解释，我们就要采取一种社会学的解释吗？我们应该将马克思视为一个社会学家吗？这种解释并不比其他解释更充分，尽管它的确在德国和奥地利已得到广泛的传播。这种解释的出发点是祛除归属于马克思的哲学，然而却没有分析哲学的充分的含义，没有表明它是如何被克服的（例如它是完全地转入实践的)。结果是，这种解释武断地肢解马克思的思想，并导致了无休止的争论，其登峰造极处就是一种新的拜占庭主义和经院哲学。从这点看，马克思主义就掉入孔德的实证主义的行列中。马克思主义思想被削减，失去了锋芒。辩证方法的应用让位给对“事实”的崇拜，批判性的挑战降格为描述。在《资本论》中，总体性这个关键性概念的使用从来就不允许遮盖本质性的辩证矛盾。相反，矛盾的原则还获得了其在黑格尔的体系化中失去了的尖锐性；马克思始终加倍强调人与工作、陌生性与异化、群体与阶级、基础与上层建筑之间的矛盾。社会学主义者将社会作为一个整体来探讨，导致了对矛盾的贬低。阶级与阶级斗争变得模糊不清。所谓的“社会”被轻易地等同于民族和民族国家。这种所谓的马克思主义的社会学主义只适合于马克思在对“哥达纲领”(1875年）的评论中有力批判过的那种意识形态和政治框架。任何表现得像个“马克思主义者”的实证主义社会学家，都倾向于改良主义。因此，它对某些人而言的坏名声，对另一些人则是具有吸引力的。今天，这种社会学明显地变得保守，尽管它最初并没有将知识和批判相分离，例如圣西门和傅立叶所实践的那样—他们属于浪漫主义的左翼。\n\n14\n\n马克思的社会学\n\n扫描全能王创建","previous_page":13,"next_page":15}