{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f7d34421-cae7-401d-810d-1da94fb53e5d","title":"辩证法的舞蹈：马克思方法的步骤","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120053462","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"f7d34421-cae7-401d-810d-1da94fb53e5d","id":"f7d34421-cae7-401d-810d-1da94fb53e5d","uuid":"f7d34421-cae7-401d-810d-1da94fb53e5d","title":"辩证法的舞蹈：马克思方法的步骤","normalized_title":"辩证法的舞蹈马克思方法的步骤","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"0120053462","isbns":["0120053462","7040199289"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":343,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f7d34421-cae7-401d-810d-1da94fb53e5d","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%BE%A9%E8%AF%81%E6%B3%95%E7%9A%84%E8%88%9E%E8%B9%88%EF%BC%9A%E9%A9%AC%E5%85%8B%E6%80%9D%E6%96%B9%E6%B3%95%E7%9A%84%E6%AD%A5%E9%AA%A4","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/f7d34421-cae7-401d-810d-1da94fb53e5d/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/f7d34421-cae7-401d-810d-1da94fb53e5d/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/f7d34421-cae7-401d-810d-1da94fb53e5d","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f7d34421-cae7-401d-810d-1da94fb53e5d/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/f7d34421-cae7-401d-810d-1da94fb53e5d/search"},"page":{"printed_page":39,"pdf_page":64,"physical_index":64,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"bda3c72a0eaf742dab70988f75872aacec76be7f4f81f85b4b9856f6795adece"},"chapter":"第三章内在关系哲学","content":"在《从黑格尔到马克思》和《走向对卡尔·马克思的理解》中，胡克动摇在这两种性质相反的解释模式之间。在必须作出选择的压力下，胡克最终在《马克思和马克思主义者》中决定选择因果解释论，而马克思的历史观被宣布为一种“一元论理论”，即把生产方式当成了决定所有重要社会发展的惟一因素(1955，37，36)。在最后的分析中，把马克思主义分割成独立的整体完全使胡克不可能运用他自己对马克思的社会关系的大量洞见来解释他所知道的确实存在的复杂的相互作用。这并不是要忽视由于各种各样的原因，胡克对马克思主义的看法已经随着岁月的流逝而改变了的事实。我只是指出了他在早期著作中所采取的立场，这种立场给后来的发展留下了余地，甚至很可能造成了这种发展。\n\n第四也是最后一点，我认为我有正当的理由把内在关系哲学归于马克思，因为，如果不这样的话，就会导致马克思与滋养他的哲学传统彻底决裂。黑格尔、莱布尼兹和斯宾诺莎都探讨过事物和/或术语的，使它们在整体(拥有不同的名称如“物质”、“自然”、“上帝”等等)的内部关系中表现出特色的意义；并且，根据马克思的大量笔记来判断，这些都是青年马克思极为慎重地研究过的思想家(马克\n\n39\n\n第三章 内在关系哲学","previous_page":null,"next_page":40}