{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86","title":"诸众的语法 当代生活方式的分析","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787100146678","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86","id":"fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86","uuid":"fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86","title":"诸众的语法 当代生活方式的分析","normalized_title":"诸众的语法当代生活方式的分析","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787100146678","isbns":["9787100146678"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":163,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%AF%B8%E4%BC%97%E7%9A%84%E8%AF%AD%E6%B3%95%20%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB%E6%96%B9%E5%BC%8F%E7%9A%84%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86/search"},"page":{"printed_page":101,"pdf_page":106,"physical_index":106,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"25148a11afd003d249dcc8e4c69cbc944fcd89f3df9fd793844800b488bec7bb"},"chapter":"诸众的语法","content":"现在让我们转到西蒙栋的第二个论题。在这个论题里，作者论述：集体、集体的经验、团体的生活，并不像我们通常认为的那样，单一个体的特质会在其中减弱或消失；相反，它是一个新的、更彻底个性化的领域。通过参与到集体中，这个主体一点也不会放弃那个最独特的单一个体的特质，才有机会个性化，至少在一定程度上能与人共享预个性的现实，而这种预个性是所有个体在自身都有着的。根据西蒙栋所说，在集体中，我们努力完善我们的奇异性，使其达到高潮。只有在集体中，当然不是在孤立的主体中，才能使认知、语言和生产力具有个性化体验的形状。\n\n这一论点能让我们对“人民”和“诸众”之间的对立有一个更好的了解。对于诸众来说，集体不是向心的或者合并的。它不是在其中形成“公意”和预示国家统一的场所。由于诸众的集体经验是使个性化的过程更为激进，而不是更为黯淡，出于对这种经验的考虑，作为原则问题，可以推断匀质性将被排除在外；能够为至高无上的统治者“代表”些什么或者向至高无上的统治者“转移”些什么的也将被排除在外。诸众的集体（collection of the multitude）被视为未来的或者第二级的个性化、建立非代表制民主政体（non-representational democracy）的可行性。逆向地说，我们可以把“非代表制民主政体”定义为历史一社会个性化的预个性：科学、知识、富有成效的合作和普遍智能。这个“许多”坚持作为“许多”，没有追求国家的统一是因为：(1)由于个性化的奇异性，他们已把各种预个性固有的统一性/共性丢在后面；(2）通过集体行动，他们更加重视和促进个性化的进程。\n\n第三天：作为主观性的诸众\n\n101\n\n80","previous_page":100,"next_page":102}