{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86","title":"诸众的语法 当代生活方式的分析","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787100146678","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86","id":"fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86","uuid":"fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86","title":"诸众的语法 当代生活方式的分析","normalized_title":"诸众的语法当代生活方式的分析","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787100146678","isbns":["9787100146678"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":163,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%AF%B8%E4%BC%97%E7%9A%84%E8%AF%AD%E6%B3%95%20%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB%E6%96%B9%E5%BC%8F%E7%9A%84%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86/search"},"page":{"printed_page":48,"pdf_page":53,"physical_index":53,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"80a2f9d091cd4d9b414f08f93f4389deee1f76aec7dd5c0a32f3a6d338e77c1b"},"chapter":"诸众的语法","content":"没有公共领域的公共性\n\n我们已经说过，诸众是由没有在家的感觉来定义的，正像由随之而来的诸众对“共同之处”、对抽象智力的熟悉来定义。现在我们需要补充的是恐惧/安全避难所的辩证恰恰源于这种对抽象智力的熟悉。“精神生活”的公众性和共享性被染上了矛盾的色彩：就其本身和本质而言，它也是消极的可能性的宿主、令人畏惧的形象的宿主。公共智力是统一的基础，从这个基础上，既可以蹦出令人毛骨悚然的保护形式也可以涌出能实现真正意义上的安全的保护形式（取决于保护我们免受上述前一种保护形式的伤害的程度)。诸众所依靠的公共智力也是反对势力发展的起点。当人类的基本才能（思维、语言、自我反思和学习能力）来到最前沿，局面会出现令人不安、令人郁闷的现象；或者它甚至可以让位给非公开的公共领域，或者让位给非政府的公共领域，远离主权的神话和礼制。\n\n我的论点用极其简洁的方式说，就是：如果智力的公共性不交给公共领域范畴，不交给众人可以参与公共事务的政治空间范畴，就会产生可怕的后果。没有公共领域的公共性(a publicness without a public sphere):这就是消极的面—邪恶，如果你愿意听的话，这就是诸众的体验。弗洛伊德在他“不可思议”(弗洛伊德，《论文集》)一文中显示了外来的思想力量如何能够具有令人痛苦的特性。他说，对于病人来说，思想有一种外在的、实际的、立即生效的力量。害怕，这种精神状态由于他人的影响会成为条件反射的、毁灭性的。此外，同样的情况，在巫师降神会上，参与者被捆绑在一起，形成一种融合的关系，看上去好像被抹去了个体特性的每一丝痕迹。那么，弗洛伊德研究的对“思想万能”的信仰和巫师降神会的极端情况明确清楚地例证了没有公共领域的公共性会成什么样子；当普遍智能不被铰接进政治空间里又会成什么样子。\n\n048\n\n诸众的语法","previous_page":47,"next_page":49}