{"resolved":true,"match_type":"uuid","source_type":"original_book","book_id":"fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86","title":"诸众的语法 当代生活方式的分析","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787100146678","requested_by":"printed_page","book":{"source_type":"original_book","book_id":"fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86","id":"fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86","uuid":"fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86","title":"诸众的语法 当代生活方式的分析","normalized_title":"诸众的语法当代生活方式的分析","author":null,"edition":null,"publisher":null,"year":null,"isbn":"9787100146678","isbns":["9787100146678"],"parsed":true,"ai_readable":true,"document_type":"book","page_count":163,"navigation_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86","title_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/title/%E8%AF%B8%E4%BC%97%E7%9A%84%E8%AF%AD%E6%B3%95%20%E5%BD%93%E4%BB%A3%E7%94%9F%E6%B4%BB%E6%96%B9%E5%BC%8F%E7%9A%84%E5%88%86%E6%9E%90","fixed_page_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/ai/book/fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86/page/{printed_page}","path_api_url_template":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/book/fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86/page/{printed_page}","read_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86","page_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86/page","search_url":"https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/books/fe4bea74-cc49-42f1-b9da-df6f304bda86/search"},"page":{"printed_page":50,"pdf_page":55,"physical_index":55,"physical_index_base":0,"printed_page_status":"recognized","page_sha256":"7aa89ae0fca7422a010671e9cf0d61b883697831953a12d0acf3c1a427d24a8d"},"chapter":"诸众的语法","content":"智力的公共性，也就是说智慧共享，在某种意义上使每个死板的劳动分工归于无效；然而，在另一种意义上却在助长人身依附（personal dependence)。普遍智能、劳动分工的终止、人身依附：这三个方面是相互关联的。智力的公共性，当它不是发生在公共领域时便转化成等级制度肆无忌惮的增殖扩张（unchecked proliferation of hierarchies)，还像它们疯长般的毫无理由。说这种依附关系是个人的（personal）有两层含义：在劳工世界，一个人依赖于这个人或依赖于那个人，不是依赖于具有匿名强制力的规则；此外，是整个人的屈服，是这个人的基本的交际和认知习性。\n\n哪个“一”属于“许多”？\n\n我们的分析是从“人民”和“诸众”这两方面之间的对立开始的。到目前为止的探讨中，有一点依然是清楚的，这就是诸众并没有让自身摆脱那个“一”，排除自身的普遍性，排除自身的共同性/共享性；倒是对“一”做了重新定义。诸众的“一”已与国家构建的、人民向其会聚的“一”不再\n\n050\n\n诸众的语法\n\n42","previous_page":49,"next_page":51}