---
schema_version: "library-reader-v1"
source_type: "original_book"
title: "Pressed for Time The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism"
author: null
edition: null
publisher: null
year: null
isbn: "9780226196473"
library_document_id: "bff2be14-96b0-46f1-8e61-474593cba908"
source_sha256: "76a6e48672ea74cbf4a478bce933f7ea7fe347bf2e5daac191fc3c1a58a56b41"
pdf_physical_page_count: 228
pdf_physical_page_index_base: 0
range_start: 200
range_count: 10
html_url: "https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/bff2be14-96b0-46f1-8e61-474593cba908?start=200&limit=10"
markdown_url: "https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/bff2be14-96b0-46f1-8e61-474593cba908.md?start=200&limit=10"
previous_url: "https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/bff2be14-96b0-46f1-8e61-474593cba908.md?start=190&limit=10"
next_url: "https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/bff2be14-96b0-46f1-8e61-474593cba908.md?start=210&limit=10"
---

# Pressed for Time The Acceleration of Life in Digital Capitalism

> 页码规则：PDF_PHYSICAL_PAGE_INDEX 是从 0 开始的权威文件物理页索引；PRINTED_PAGE 是页面中识别出的印刷页码，可能为空，二者不得混用。

## PDF_PHYSICAL_PAGE_INDEX=200 | PRINTED_PAGE=188

24

Notes to Pages 23–28

188

## PDF_PHYSICAL_PAGE_INDEX=201 | PRINTED_PAGE=189

also an afinity with the material cultural perspective associated with cultural anthropology, see Daniel Miller, Material Culture and Mass Consumption (Oxford: Blackwell, 1991).

STS is a very broad field with distinct theoretical positions that have often rubbed against one another quite sharply. See, for example, some of the debates about the nature of STS in the Social Studies of Science journal. There is no space to go into the details of these debates here—and anyway it’s the commonality of the approaches that I want to emphasize. A broad sample of the research can be found in journals such as Science, Technology, & Human Values and Science as Culture; the book series Inside Technology (MIT Press); and Edward Hackett, Olga Amsterdamska, Michael Lynch, and Judy Wajcman, eds., The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies, 3rd ed. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2008).

Ruth Schwartz Cowan, “From Virginia Dare to Virginia Slims: Women and Invention in America,” Technology and Culture 20, no. 1 (1979): 52.

William Dutton, Society on the Line: Information Politics in the Digital Age (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999); and William Dutton, ed., The Oxford Handbook of Internet Studies (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).

See STS studies, such as Wiebe Bijker and John Law, Shaping Technology/ Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1992); MacKenzie and Wajcman, The Social Shaping of Technology; Judy Wajcman, TechnoFeminism (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2004).

See Michel Callon, “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of Saint Brieuc Bay,” in Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?, ed. John Law (London: Routledge, 1986); Madeleine Akrich and Bruno Latour, “A Summary of a Convenient Vocabulary for the Semiotics of Human and Nonhuman Assemblies,” in Bijker and Law, Shaping Technology/Building Society, 259–64; Bruno Latour, Aramis, or The Love of Technology (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996); Bruno Latour, Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor–Network Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005); John Law and John Hassard, eds., Actor Network Theory and After (Oxford: Blackwell, 1999).

Some scholars have now moved from a focus on interaction to an interest in “intra-action” in order to get a better grasp of the way that distinct things like humans and machines get formed through their interactions in the first place. See Karen Barad, “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28, no. 3 (2003): 801–31; and Lucy Suchman, Human-Machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions, 2nd ed. (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2007). STS scholars have deployed the concept of “performativity” to encapsulate the idea that the properties of and boundaries between humans and technologies are not fixed in advance but enacted in recurrent activities. This concept is a familiar one in feminist theory through Judith Butler’s argument that gender is a performance, Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity (New York: Routledge, 1990).

Notes to Pages 29–33

37

38

39

40

41

42

189

## PDF_PHYSICAL_PAGE_INDEX=202 | PRINTED_PAGE=190

43 Hartmut Rosa, “Social Acceleration: Ethical and Political Consequences of a Desynchronized High-Speed Society” in Rosa and Scheuerman, High-Speed Society, 91.

Chapter Two

Notes to Pages 34–44

190

## PDF_PHYSICAL_PAGE_INDEX=203 | PRINTED_PAGE=191

Notes to Pages 44–51

191

## PDF_PHYSICAL_PAGE_INDEX=204 | PRINTED_PAGE=192

Notes to Pages 52–56

192

## PDF_PHYSICAL_PAGE_INDEX=205 | PRINTED_PAGE=193

Chapter Three

2 See, for example, Richard Layard, Happiness: Lessons From A New Science (London: Penguin, 2011).

Notes to Pages 57–63

193

## PDF_PHYSICAL_PAGE_INDEX=206 | PRINTED_PAGE=194

8 John Robinson and Geofrey Godbey, Time for Life: The Surprising Ways Americans Use Their Time (University Park: Penn State University Press, 1997), 231; Jonathan Gershuny, “Busyness as the Badge of Honor for the New Superordinate Working Class,” Social Research: An International Quarterly 72, no. 1 (2005): 287–314; and John Robinson “Americans Less Rushed But No Happier: 1965–2010 Trends in Subjective Time and Happiness,” Social Indicators Research 113 (2013): 1091–1104. Robinson’s latest figures (from 2010) show an unexpected decline from 2004 in the proportion of those always rushed, and he speculates that this may reflect a simple adaption to an ever-faster pace of life.

9 Among time-use specialists, the term “free time” is defined as the remaining time after time spent in market and nonmarket work and meeting physiological needs (sleeping, eating, attending to personal hygiene, and grooming) is deducted. It represents the time potentially available for leisure pursuits.

10 Goodin et al., Discretionary Time, 73.

11 Robinson and Godbey, Time for Life; Gershuny, Busyness as the Badge of Honor, 288; Gershuny and Kimberly Fisher (2013), “Exploit and Industry: Why Work Time Will Not Disappear for Our Grandchildren,” Centre for Time Use Research, Oxford University. http://www.timeuse.org/node/6934.   
12 Paul Edwards and Judy Wajcman, The Politics of Working Life (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005).

13 Jacobs and Gerson, The Time Divide, 39. The long hours of low paid workers doing multiple jobs do not figure in these discussions!

14 Man Yee Kan, Oriel Sullivan and Jonathan Gershuny, “Gender convergence in domestic work: discerning the efects of interactional and institutional barriers from large-scale data,” Sociology, 45, 2 (2011), 234–51; Harriet Presser, “Race-ethnic and gender diferences in nonstandard work shifts,” Work and Occupations, 30, 4 (2003), 412–39.

15 Kim Parker and Wendy Wang, Modern Parenthood (Pew Research Centre, 2013), 4.

18 In the United States, only about two-thirds of children under five years old now live with married parents (biological, step, or adoptive), and this declines to about 55 percent for children aged fifteen to seventeen. There has women have less adult leisure than comparable men, and that they are further disadvantaged by their disproportionate responsibility for the physical care of children (Bittman and Wajcman, “The Rush Hour,” 185).

Notes to Pages 64–66

194

## PDF_PHYSICAL_PAGE_INDEX=207 | PRINTED_PAGE=195

Notes to Pages 67–71

19

21

195

## PDF_PHYSICAL_PAGE_INDEX=208 | PRINTED_PAGE=196

Notes to Pages 71–81

196

## PDF_PHYSICAL_PAGE_INDEX=209 | PRINTED_PAGE=197

52 Michelle Budig and Nancy Folbre, “Activity, Proximity, or Responsibility? Measuring Parental Childcare Time,” in Folbre and Bittman, Family Time, 63.

53 Suzzane Bianchi, “Maternal Employment and Time with Children: Dramatic Changes of Surprising Continuity?,” Demography 37, no. 4 (2000): 401–14; Craig, Contemporary Motherhood.

54 Hartmut Rosa and William Scheuerman, eds., High-Speed Society: Social Acceleration, Power, and Modernity (University Park: Penn State University Press, 2009).

55 Zygmunt Bauman, Liquid Life (Cambridge: Polity Press, 2005), 84.

Chapter Four

1 Noelle Chesley, “Blurring Boundaries? Linking Technology Use, Spillover, Individual Distress, and Family Satisfaction,” Journal of Marriage and Family 67, no. 5 (2005): 1237–48; Linda Duxbury and Rob Smart, “The ‘Myth of Separate Worlds’: An Exploration of How Mobile Technology has Redefined Work-Life Balance,” Creating Balance?, ed. in Dans Kaiser et al. (Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 2011); Melissa Mazmanian, JoAnne Yates, and Wanda Orlikowski, “Ubiquitous Email: Individual Experiences and Organizational Consequences of BlackBerry Use” (paper presented at the 65th Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, Honolulu, Hawaii, August 5–10, 2005).

2 Harry Braverman, Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1974).

3 Donald MacKenzie and Judy Wajcman,(eds., The Social Shaping of Technology: How the Refrigerator Got Its Hum (Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press, 1985).

4 Vicki Smith, “Braverman’s Legacy: The Labor Process Tradition at 20,” Work and Occupations 21, no. 4 (1994): 431–21; Judy Wajcman, “New Connections: Social Studies of Science and Technology and Studies of Work,” Work, Employment & Society 20, no. 4 (2006): 773–86.

5 David Noble, “Social Choice in Machine Design: The Case of Automatically Controlled Machine Tools,” in Case Studies in the Labor Process, ed. Andrew Zimbalist (New York: Monthly Review Press, 1979), 19. His classic book is Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1984).

6 Nelly Oudshoorn and Trevor Pinch, eds., How Users Matter: The Co-Construction of Users and Technology (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2005).

7 Figures taken from Lee Rainie and Barry Wellman, Networked: The New Social Operating System (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2012), 174–75.

Notes to Pages 81–91

197

下一段：[继续读取](https://workshop.closeclaw.top/api/ai/read/bff2be14-96b0-46f1-8e61-474593cba908.md?start=210&limit=10)
