奎克的藏经阁 · 原书印刷页

Capitalist Realism - Is There no Alternative · 第 73 页

PDF 物理页索引 78 · MARK FISHER CAPITALIST REALISM IS THERE NO ALTERNATIVE?

书名
Capitalist Realism - Is There no Alternative
作者
未记录
印刷页
73
PDF 物理页
78(从 0 开始)
章节
MARK FISHER CAPITALIST REALISM IS THERE NO ALTERNATIVE?
UUID
4b0a32eb-418f-4a55-806b-5611337160b2
来源类型
original_book
页面 SHA-256
999ebf941cd82d64d03679e89aeea2e0faa6586fc58751ce29b47e15e40e5937

Marxist Supernanny

act of pure volition, in which the subject assumes responsibility for everything. In fact, Spinoza has immense resources for analyzing the affective regime of late capitalism, the videodrome-control apparatus described by Burroughs, Philip K. Dick and David Cronenberg in which agency is dissolved in a phantasmagoric haze of psychic and physical intoxicants. Like Burroughs, Spinoza shows that, far from being an aberrant condition, addiction is the standard state for human beings, who are habitually enslaved into reactive and repetitive behaviors by frozen images (of themselves and the world). Freedom, Spinoza shows, is something that can be achieved only when we can apprehend the real causes of our actions, when we can set aside the 'sad passions' that intoxicate and entrance us.

There's no doubt that late capitalism certainly articulates many of its injunctions via an appeal to (a certain version of) health. The banning of smoking in public places, the relentless monstering of working class diet on programs like You Are What You Eat, do appear to indicate that we are already in the presence of a paternalism without the Father. It is not that smoking is 'wrong', it is that it will lead to our failing to lead long and enjoyable lives. But there are limits to this emphasis on good health: mental health and intellectual development barely feature at all, for instance. What we see instead is a reductive, hedonic model of health which is all about 'feeling and looking good'. To tell people how to lose weight, or how to decorate their house, is acceptable; but to call for any kind of cultural improvement is to be oppressive and elitist. The alleged elitism and oppression cannot consist in the notion that a third party might know someone's interest better than they know it themselves, since, presumably smokers are deemed either to be unaware of their interests or incapable of acting in accordance with them. No: the problem is that only certain types of interest are deemed relevant, since they reflect values that are held to be consensual. Losing weight, decorating your house and

73