- BTA POST 30/2536, newspaper clipping, E. J. D. Newitt, "Lying Clocks, To the Editor of the Times," Times of London, February 10, 1908, 12.
- BTA POST 30/2536, newspaper clipping, Robert G. Orr, "Lying Clocks, To the Editor of the Times," Times of London, January 10, 1908, 12; "Lying Clocks," Times of London, November 9, 1908, 5; "The Synchronization of Clocks," Times of London, January 18, 1911, 9.
- 转引自 Gay, “Clock Synchrony," 115. 参见Rooney, Ruth Belville, 74, 77.
- 转引|自Howse, Greenwich Time, 114–115.
- "Offcial Time," Times of London, July 9, 1924, 10; Gay, "Clock Synchrony," 139.
- Thompson, "Time, Work Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism."
81 Paul Glennie and Nigel Thrift, "Reworking E. P. Thompson's 'Time,Work Discipline, and Industrial Capitalism,'" Time and Society 5, no. 3 (1996):275-299,此处为第277页,第284-285页;修正主义的描述，参见Paul Glennieand Nigel Thrift, Shaping the Day: A History of Timekeeping in England andWales 1300-1800 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009),他们试图站在汤普森的立场上将其拆解。思里夫特细数了兰德斯（《时间中的革命》）、哈维（《后现代的状况》），以及加里森（《爱因斯坦的时钟》）的观点，他们都已经采纳了汤普森的观点，对建立一种“汤普森式的”叙述贡献良多。关于追随汤普森的任务时间概念的美国历史学家，参见Michael O'Malley, "Time, Work, and Task Orientation: A Critique of AmericanHistoriography,"Time and Society 1, no. 3 (1992): 341–358, 此处为第343页，第348页。质疑汤普森的假说的其他人有Gay,“Clock Synchrony,”以Michael J. Sauter, "Clockwatchers and Stargazers: Time Discipline in Early
时间的全球史
114