Modern Berlin,"American Historical Review 112, no. 3 (2007): 685-709. 汉斯·约阿希姆·沃斯并没有对汤普森的时间管理标记系统提出太多疑问，而是质疑其资料的基础（实际上是很大一部分）。他自己的著作把兴趣放在工业资本主义下的工作日的延长上面。参见Hans Joachim Voth，“Timeand Work in Eigh teenth Century London," Journal of Economic History 58,no. 1 (1998): 29-58， 此处为第30页。还可参看Hans Joachim Voth, Time andWork in England, 1750–1830 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000). 关于时钟和实行奴隶制的美国南方的时间规训，参见Mark M. Smith,Masteredby the Clock: Time, Slavery, and Freedom in the American South (Chapel Hill:University of North Carolina Press, 1997)，他表明钟表和时钟规训很容易跟农业、种植业劳动联系在一起。
- David Montgomcry, The Fall of the House of Labor: The Workplace, the State, and American Labor Activism, 1865-1925 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), 尤是讨论 “the manager's brain under the workman's cap”的第一章。
- Smithsonian Institution's National Museum for American History Archives, Warshaw Collection of Business Americana, Watch Works and Clock Works, collection no. 60, box 3, folder "Pneumatic,"pamphlet advertising a pneumatic watchman clock.
84.米歇尔·福柯的著作因为就规训机构提出的一套论点堪为标志；参见Foucault, Discipline and Punish, 150–151, 156–162.
- 在现代早期德国的时间规范方面，参见Sauter,“Clockwatchers andStargazers."
第二章 节约社会时间
115