为了理解当代欧洲移民和种族化女性作为劳动力与部分人口构成的、似乎免于被指控为造成经济社会及文化威胁甚至还被塑造成需要拯救的受害者的“例外”，我们需要更细致地考察社会再生产的重组。移民和种族化女性主要就业的护理与家政等社会再生产领域，与雇佣移民和种族化男性主导的其他领域有何本质区别？
首先，正如众多学者强调的，“情感性”（affectivity）是“社会再生产劳动”的基本，尽管并非排他性的构成要素。这一点至关重要，因为社会再生产中的“情感性”成分使其在根本上难以被机械化或自动化替代。正如西尔维娅·费代里奇（Silvia Federici）指出，
社会再生产与种族化的剩余人口
<sup>8</sup> 参见 Rachel Salazar Parreñass, Servants of Globalization: Women, Migration and Domestic Work, Stanford CA: Stanford University Press, 2001; James A. Tyner, Made in the Philippines: Gendered Discourses and the Making of Migrants, London and New York: Routledge, 2004; Nana Oishi, Women in Motion: Globalization, State Policies and Labor Migration in Asia, Stanford CA: Stanford University Press, 2005; Maurice Schiff, Andrew R. Morrison and Mirja Sjoeblom, The International Migration of Women, New York: World Bank Publications and Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2007; Jennifer Rubin, Michael S. Rendall, Lila Rabinovich, Flavia Tsang, Constantijn van Oranje-Nassau and Barbara Janta, Migrant Women in the European Labour Force: Current Situation and Future Prospects, European Commission, Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunity, RAND Europe, 2008; International Labour Office, Domestic Workers Across the World: Global and Regional Statistics and the Extent of Legal Protection, Geneva: International Labour Office, 2013.
126
121