资本主义：概念、理念、图像
35, 18-21, http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/0263276415592245.
<sup>14</sup> ‘Theodor W. Adorno on “Marx and the Basic Concepts of Sociological Theory” from a Seminar Transcript in the Summer Semester of 1962’, Historical Materialism, vol. 26, no. 1 (2018), pp. 154-164.
<sup>15</sup> 关于“新马克思阅读”，参见 Hans-Georg Backhaus, ‘On the Dialectics of the Value-Form’ (1969), trans. Michael Eldred and Mike Roth, Thesis Eleven 1 (1980); 以 及更一般地，Riccardo Bellofiore and Thommaso Redolfi Riva, ‘The Neue Marx-Lektüre: Putting the Critique of Political Economy back into the Critique of Society’, Radical Philosophy 189 (January/February 2014), pp. 24-36, www.radicalphilosophyarchive.com/article/the-neue-marx-lekture. 连同 Peter Sloterdijk’s Critique of Cynical Reason (1983; trans. Michael Eldred, London and New York: Verso, 1988), “新 马克思阅读”构成了法兰克福批判理论在阿多诺之后、非（且反）哈贝马斯的两 条主要发展路径之一。
<sup>16</sup> 关于“法国式”与“意大利式”解读之间的差异，参见Étienne Balibar, ‘APoint of Heresy in Western Marxism: Althusser’s and Tronti’s Antithetic Readings ofCapital in the Early 1960s’, in Nick Nesbitt (ed.), The Concept in Crisis: ‘Reading Cap-ital’Today, Durham NC and London: Duke University Press, 2017, pp. 93-112. 当然，各国的情境在内部更为复杂，例如 米歇尔·亨利（Michel Henri）的法国现象学式解读所显示的那样。Michel Henri, Marx: I, Une Philosophie de la réalité; II, UnePhilosophie de l’économie, Paris: Éditions Gallimard, 1976; 英文节选版为 Marx: APhilosophy of Human Reality, trans. Kathleen McLaughlin, Bloomington IN: IndianaUniversity Press, 1983.
8