奎克的藏经阁 · 原书印刷页

断裂的时间与“异质性”的存在——德勒兹《差异与重复》的文本解读 · 第 338 页

PDF 物理页索引 347 · 第五章

书名
断裂的时间与“异质性”的存在——德勒兹《差异与重复》的文本解读
作者
未记录
印刷页
338
PDF 物理页
347(从 0 开始)
章节
第五章
UUID
920f76e4-c853-4e20-9c82-a745945fe63b
来源类型
original_book
页面 SHA-256
7aaf60924ab5150911a0a209646cf665e48ec9743c812fa57dc9ecc96c9767d1

断裂的时间与“异质性”的存在—德勒兹《差异与重复》的文本解读

ABSTRACT

This dissertation is a text commentary of Gilles Deleuze’s Difference and Repetition which reflected his transition of philosophical thought. Deleuze formed his concept of difference during 1960s under the influence of Bergson, Nietzsche and Marxism, while he criticized Hegel's philosophy of identity. Based on his criticism of traditional philosophy, Deleuze declaimed his own philosophical idea for the first time in the book Dif ference and Repetition : “Philosophy is the creation of concept". From then on he insisted to speak and write philosophy in his's own way. Deleuze's concept of difference showed that philosophy so far from Plato were all situated under the fourfold limitation of difference, and since modern time, directed by Leibniz and Hegel's idea of infiniteness, philosophy went on to the extremity of identity. To pursue the root, this is the result of the limitation of non-time concept of space. Deleuze criticized the Aristotle's tradition of dualism which through fabricated hypothesis formed the opposition between substance and appearance, idea and reality, and finally the lifeless dialectics architected the closed theory system which eclipsed the variety of change. Deleuze borrowed Bergson's concept of time and free will and utilized Nietzsche's concept of eternal reincarnation to reformed Bergson's concept of time, established his own ontology, the core of which is difference, regarded the appearance as the true reality itself, and through the criticism of Heidegger's ontology, he showed that the change of being in time and the extend of being in space are the appearance of the live force of philosophy, in doing so, he encourage the philosophy to concern about the development of social reality. Deleuze's difference is the

338